JANOG16 Programs - JANOG - JApan Network Operators Group

Discussions of IPv6 addresses distribution policy is reheated in these days world wide.
from the distributer side point of view
- initial size of distribution address is oversized, is it going to be all right?
- /48 is oversized. Shall we resize it smaller?
from ISP's point of view
- We desires addresses, but the rule is too hard. Give us them easy.
- Multihoming with multiple addresses, Need ingress filtering?
from user's point of view
- Desires IPv4 like multihoming, Give PI to us.
from standization point of view
- 64+64 is wrong in the first place. Need change.
- ULA will soon become available. Is ISP not related?
The issue here is that this kind of discussion is active in Europe and the United States, and yet nearly none of it in Asia.
We are discussing from both ISP's point of view and user's point of view and then get it form the foundation for expressing opinions to IPv6 community.

Discussion Point:

Is PI nessesary for IPv6 multi homing?
Is there anyone is not be able to get addresses dispite he/she desires addresses in Japan? (meaning that the requirements easing is not needed?)
Is it going to be a problem for you If it comes to the situation which get changed 64+64?(Is this a matter of vendors?)

13:45 - 14:15

Privacy information protection Session JANOG's privacy information protection WG report Edit

Speaker:

Yuichi Ikejiri[JANOG operation commitee/NTT Comunications Inc.]

Outline:

I am going to report JANOG's privacy information protection WG which mainly be active from mid Feb. to whole Mar. and then discuss about the recent activity on this at JANOG with the audience.

Discussion Point:

I want gather the opinions to this reported activity and advice, then meke them as reference for aftertime.

Privacy information protection at JPNIC WHOIS Edit

Speaker:

Susumu Sato [JPNIC]

Outline:

JPNIC modified the specification that of changing WHOIS display format and adding WHOIS information started in March 2005 including accepting privacy information protection laws which is fully in effect since April 2005. I am going to explain how and why the modification is, and then consider the way it's supporsed to be based on information disclosure both for network operations and for privacy protection.

Discussion Point:

How can we even out WHOIS information disclosure of necesary for network operations and protections of privacy informations. About the requirements and the opinions for present JPNIC WHOIS.

14:15 - 14:45

Activity report of NSP-SEC-JP Edit

Speakers:

Takanori Mizuguchi [NSP-SEC-JP/NTT.net]
Tomoya Yoshida [NSP-SEC-JP/NTT Communications]
Yoshinobu Matsuzaki [NSP-SEC-JP/Internet Initiative Japan Inc.]

Outline:

nsp-security-japan[NSP-SEC-JP] is the mailing list which for incident responces consisted of volunteers which intended sustaining whole network with the activities of addressing the vulnerabilities such as intrusions with communicating ISPs and NSPs each other. I will present topics of a responce method of DoS using the example of DoS incident which occuered at the govermental site this year and the updates after JANOG15.

14:45 - 15:05 Break

15:05 - 15:50

Box-Maker's Much Ado about Nothing. Edit

Speakers:

Katsuhito Asano
Motonori Shindo
Hiroaki Kanematsu
Kuniaki Kondo
Naoki Nemoto
Kouichi Hyodo
Kouichiro Fujimoto
Kazumasa Morita

Outline:

The important thing in developing new information communication machines is not only new technologies and also framework and cash. The factor for low-level implimentation of boxies are not a technical reason but costs to fulfill. For example, 40G optical Interface costs high then uses 10G with innovations. If the costs measures up to, We can develop 100G interfaces. Furthermore, No longer the apology "Thebehavior is along to the specifications." developing VLSI with heavy lifting by many engineers to release good boxies. It does not come to realization with the costs problem, the actual situation is striking a bargain making out with the cash in hand. Today, the engineers who take part in that kind of developing get together and discussing with users to bridges tha gap between the ideal and the real. And also, We discusses with understanding differences of development systems and the market situation related to venture companies between Japan and the U.S. The cash talk is not evil.:br; The balance sence of money is said that is a part of technique.

Discussion Point:

What should be considered to make boxies and how to build good relations with users.

15:50 - 16:20

Why is the reverse referense of DNS is so slow. Edit

Speaker:

Masato Minda [Japan Registry Services Co., Ltd.]

Outline:

The reverse referense of DNS is slow in many cases. This matter is viewed as lame delegation (which is wrong configurations of name servers) is the causes.
But as I examined into this, the main cause is identified as both BIND(till the version BIND8) behavior and essence of the configurations of reverse referenses. At this presentation, I am going to explain the mechanisms of making DNS referense slow and suggest the solusion for name server configulations. Then I will mension about the solusion's demelits. [#o9f3474f]

16:20 - 17:40

The realities of Pro baseball broadcasting Edit

Speakers:

Yosuga Kikuchi [Produce on Demand,Inc.]
Tatsuhiko Ishiyama [TV Asahi Productions]
Satoru Tsurumaki [Softbank BB]
Osamu Hamada[ShowTime,Inc.]
Takuya Harada [Chiba Lotte Marines]

Outline:

Broadcasting and Communications convergence is become popular talk recently, the major contents "Pro baseball" is now distributed on internet and the trend is watched.
In this session, we would like to discuss about technical realities and problems, In this session, We would like to discuss about some technical situations and issues of internet broadcasting, varias barrier and issues, business sided future direction with Pro baseball team person in charge and broadcast companies. [#c7e2147e]

Discussion Point:

I am going to shed light on the matters as internet distribution like the bussines matters, copyrights etc. not apply only to technical methology. Then discuss about the issue and build the solution with network operators. [#c7b7a4ae]

17:40 - 17:50

Closing Declaration / The next previous notice Edit

Speaker:

Hiroaki Kanematsu [JANOG16 Steering Committee]